|
by Gail Fawcett and Richard Shillington
The treatment of people with disabilities has emerged again as a topical policy issue with
the establishment of a task force on disability by the federal government. The task force is
investigating issues concerning the economic security of persons with disabilities in particular,
the effects of income support programs and the tax system. In this issue of Insight, we highlight
some findings from the tax data, and from a forthcoming book by Gail Fawcett on the economic
circumstances of Canadians with disabilities which will be published later in 1996 by the Office for
Disability Issues at Human Resources Development Canada.
Income support programs for persons with disabilities
Income support programs for persons with disabilities often have arbitrary eligibility rules
and provide uneven levels of support. These programs include social assistance, CPP/QPP
Disability Benefits, Workers' Compensation, and private and employer disability insurance
benefits, both short-term and long-term. Some of the program benefits are taxable, others are not.
Eligibility for these programs depends upon a person's age, their work history and how they
acquired their disability.
Poverty rates vary markedly among persons with disabilities who rely on these different
income support programs. Two-thirds of those who rely on social assistance live in poverty.
Because of insufficient work histories, these individuals are often not eligible for CPP/QPP or
Workers' Compensation benefits. Those with access to CPP/QPP Disability Benefits are
somewhat better off, but still more than one-quarter are poor. About 14% of those receiving
Workers' Compensation available only to people whose disability was caused on the job are
poor (which is comparable to the poverty
rate of the general population).
Employment for Persons with Disabilities
Table 1: Labour force participation rates of persons aged 15-64 with and without disabilities, 1991
| Without disabilities | 80.9% |
| With disabilities | 56.3% |
| Mild disability | 70.9% |
| Moderate disability | 44.8% |
| Severe disability | 25.6% |
Employment is certainly an important
factor in alleviating poverty for persons with
or without disabilities. Yet employment is often
problematic when an unaccommodating
work environment turns a personal disability
into an employment handicap. The labour
force participation rate for all working-age
persons with disabilities is lower than that of
the general population (Table 1). Not surprisingly, the participation rates ares lowest for persons
with moderate and severe disabilities. These data demonstrate that there is room for improvement
in the employment of persons with disabilities which would, in turn, increase their self-reliance
and their economic security.

Figure 1 illustrates that persons with and without disabilities who
have higher levels of
education are more likely to participate in the labour force. The negative impact of disability on
labour force participation is greatest for those with the least education. Both these factors
suggest that education is an important way to minimize the employment disadvantages that can
result from having a disability.
Does the tax system help?
 The disability tax credit and the credit for allowable medical expenses are two important
measures designed to provide income tax relief to persons with disabilities. These non-refundable
credits reduce the amount of income taxes paid and they are transferable to supporting family
members. These
measures, referred to
as tax expenditures,
reduce annual federal
and provincial
government revenues
collected by about
three-quarters of a
billion dollars
(Finance, 1995). They
are sometimes
criticized because
they are of no benefit
to persons with
disabilities who do
not have taxable
income.
Only 2.3 per
cent of taxfilers claim
the disability tax
credit far below the
18% of the
population with
disabilities. The rate
of claim is somewhat higher for lower-income groups (Figure 2). The Department of Finance
estimates that one-third of persons with severe disabilities get no value from the disability tax
credit.
The pattern of take-up rates by income is similar for the medical expense claim (see Figure 3). Lower-
income taxfilers are
slightly more likely to
claim medical expenses,
and overall, about 6% of
taxfilers use this credit.
It is worth noting that
the amounts claimed
increase substantially as
income rises. This
pattern suggests that
lower-income persons
with disabilities may not
be getting equal access
to this tax credit, either
because they do not
have the cash to spend
on medical expenses in
the first place, or
because they do not
have access to
sophisticated tax advice
on the availability of this
credit or how to claim it.
Gail Fawcett is a research associate with the Centre for International Statistics at the CCSD. Dr
Fawcett has a PhD in sociology and specializes in statistical analysis and disability issues.
Richard Shillington is the Centre for International Statistics' senior research associate. Dr.
Shillington has a PhD in statistics. He has worked for several commissions investigating social
policy questions and issues of taxation.
Canadian Council on Social Development,
190 O'Connor Street, Suite 100,
Ottawa, Ontario, K2P 2R3
|