|Ex-chief statistician picks apart cancellation of long census|
|Mardi, 20 Septembre 2011 20:50|
OTTAWA—The federal government cancelled the long-form census with little heed to the consequences of its decision, according to a new first-hand account of the drama that unfolded a year ago.
An essay by former chief statistician Munir Sheikh says the census decision has shaken Statistics Canada’s neutrality and independence, and put at risk the government’s own work in many areas.
READ: Sheikh’s essay in full.
In the essay, Sheikh warns statisticians working at the federal agency to “guard against political intervention” until better solutions are found.
Sheikh also raises concerns over poor data on aboriginal populations, especially housing on reserves, and about the government making key decisions on pension reform without having reliable information on wealth in Canadian households.
But it’s the cancellation of the long-form census that compounds the weakness in other data, he writes.
“No country can be among the league of civilized societies without intelligent policy development. And, intelligent policy development is not possible without good data,” he says in a 28-page essay published this week.
The government’s new, voluntary approach to collecting census-like data “is a change in course from the existing Statistics Canada practice of achieving both privacy and data quality objectives,” Sheikh writes.
The essay is Sheikh’s contribution to a volume on “intelligent government” published by the Centre for the Study of Living Standards.
Sheikh resigned in July 2010 over the Conservative government’s handling of the issue, saying it put false words in his mouth in explaining to the public why the long-form census was cancelled.
The government made its decision to cancel the mandatory long census in June 2010, but left the mandatory short census that goes to all households intact. The long form was replaced by a voluntary survey of households that is now underway.
Spokespeople for Industry Minister Christian Paradis did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
While many a critic has made the same points as Sheikh, his essay is a meticulous analysis that comes straight from the horse’s mouth, asking pointed questions about the government’s ability to deal with the fallout of the census decision.
He recalls that the government justified its decision by saying it needed to protect the privacy of respondents.
“What was wrong with Statistics Canada’s approach to achieving the twin objectives of quality and privacy?” he asks, pointing out that the privacy commissioner never expressed any concerns, and that complaints from the public were almost non-existent — two in 2006 and one in 2001.
In analyzing the effects of the cancellation of the long form, he asks, “why did the government not consult with data users?”
Government policy itself is dependent on information gleaned from the long-form census to assess labour and skills shortages, the educational attainments of immigrants and aboriginal peoples, the work experience of disabled people, and so on, Sheikh writes.
Statistics Canada’s own information is also hampered by the lack of a solid baseline that was provided by the long-form census in the past, he adds.
“The agency’s philosophy to date has been to produce the highest quality data at least cost. The cancellation of the long-form census, and its substitution with a voluntary survey, turns this objective upside down,” he says.
“The agency will now produce low quality survey data with increased expense of $30 million.”
Sheikh pointed out that the census costs in Canada were lower than in other countries. Per household, the cost in 2006 was $43.77 in Canada, but was $126.18 (Canadian) in the United States and $49.68 (Canadian) in Australia, he writes.
He also worries about the need for a more up-to-date Consumer Price Index — a key ingredient in wage settlements and monetary policy.
And he wonders how the government can overhaul the country’s pension system while at the same time lacking crucial information that would come from an ongoing wealth survey.
“The debate on the adequacy of pensions is taking place without the knowledge about personal asset levels of Canadians at the time of their retirement,” Sheikh writes.
“The impact of the financial and economic crisis cannot be fully examined without an understanding of changes to household wealth.”
He says the agency’s well-earned international reputation for impartiality and quality is at risk, as is its trustworthiness within Canada.
But he also suggests solutions.
Statistics Canada needs to reallocate resources from less relevant data collections to more modern needs — even if the clients kick up a storm, he says.
At the same time, the government needs to stop cutting StatsCan’s budget, and increase it instead, so it has a hope of meeting its clients’ expanding needs and providing information for free, he says.
More importantly, Parliament needs to change the Statistics Canada Act to legislate the agency’s independence and to ensure political interference in data collection doesn’t happen again, he says.
Until that happens, the agency had better keep its back up, he adds.
“It must guard against political intervention and preserve its integrity and reputation.”