In this sixth edition of CCSD’s Disability Information Sheets, we provide statistics on persons with disabilities and their access to and use of computers. Overall, persons with disabilities have more limited access to personal computers. This is only partially due to the fact that persons with disabilities tend to be older, on average, than the population without disabilities and older persons generally tend to have more limited access to some types of technology than do younger persons. The primary source of data for this Information Sheet is Statistics Canada’s General Social Survey, Cycle 14 (Access to and Use of Information Communication Technology, 2000).1
When we think of "new technology" today, we often think of the personal computer. It can be used as an information and communications tool, a labour-saving device, an integral tool for employment purposes, an interface for those with specific types of disabilities, a learning tool, a shopping aide, and a method of staying connected to the outside world. Yet overall, persons with disabilities are much less likely than their non-disabled counterparts to have a computer in their home. In 2000, the majority (57.8 per cent) of persons with disabilities did not have a computer in their home, compared with 37.2 per cent among persons without disabilities (see Chart 1).
Persons without disabilities were also more likely to have more than one home computer. As illustrated in Chart 1, 15.5 per cent of those without disabilities had two or more computers at home, compared with 10.3 per cent for those with disabilities.
Some, but certainly not all, of these differences are due to age. Persons with disabilities tend to be older than those without disabilities,2 and older persons are usually less likely than younger ones to have home computers. Therefore, one would expect to find that persons with disabilities were less likely, overall, to have home computers. Even when we compare individuals within age groups, however, we still find that those without disabilities have greater access to home computers. Perhaps not surprisingly, this gap is least pronounced among those in the youngest age group. For example, among those aged 15 to 34, 35.7 per cent of persons with disabilities did not have a computer in their home, compared with 32.1 per cent of their non-disabled counterparts. And in this age group, those with and those without disabilities were almost equally likely to have multiple computers at home (18.5 per cent and 17.4 per cent, respectively).
| Number of Computers in the Home, Persons with and without Disabilities, by Age Group, Canada, 2000 | |||
| Age Group | Number of home computers | Persons with disabilities | Persons without disabilities |
| 15-34 years | none | 35.7% | 32.1% |
| one | 45.8% | 50.5% | |
| Two or more | 18.5% | 17.4% | |
| 35-54 years | None | 43.1% | 30.2% |
| One | 42.2% | 52.6% | |
| Two or more | 14.7% | 17.2% | |
| 55-64 years | None | 58.5% | 48.4% |
| One | 34.2% | 40.0% | |
| Two or more | 7.3% | 11.5% | |
| 65+ years | None | 82.0% | 78.4% |
| One | 14.5% | 17.6% | |
| Two or more | 3.5% | 4.0% | |
| Source: Calculations by the Canadian Council on Social Development using Statistics Canada's General Social Survey, Cycle 14, 2000. | |||
In other age groups, we see greater gaps. Among those aged 35 to 54, 43.1 per cent of those with disabilities did not have a computer in their home, compared with 30.2 per cent among those without disabilities. Similarly, for people aged 55 to 64, 58.5 per cent of those with disabilities did not have a computer in their home, compared with 48.4 per cent among their non-disabled counterparts. We also see a greater likelihood of having multiple computers in the home among those without disabilities in these age groups.
Although there is still a gap in terms of having a home computer among seniors (those aged 65 and older), the differences between those with and those without disabilities is less pronounced. A large majority of both groups of seniors lack a home computer (82.0 per cent and 78.4 per cent, respectively).
Presumably, having a computer in the home facilitates computer use, and if persons with disabilities are less likely to have a home computer, does this necessarily mean they are less likely to use a computer? Overall, the answer is "yes." In fact, for persons with disabilities, the rate of having a home computer is almost the same as their rate of computer use (42.2 per cent and 43.0 per cent, respectively). Among persons without disabilities, 62.8 per cent had one or more computers in their homes, but 71.8 per cent had used a computer in the last 12 months (see Table 2). To better understand the important patterns, we must again look at these data within different age groups.
| Computer Use in Past 12 Months and % with at least One Home Computer, by Age Group, Persons with and without Disabilities, Canada, 2000 | ||||
| Persons with disabilities | Persons without disabilities | |||
| Age Group | Had at least one home computer | Used computer in the past 12 months | Had at least one home computer | Used computer in the past 12 months |
| 15-34 years | 64.3% | 80.1% | 69.8% | 86.8% |
| 35-54 years | 56.9% | 61.1% | 69.8% | 75.3% |
| 55-64 years | 41.5% | 36.7% | 51.5% | 49.8% |
| 65+ years | 18.0% | 10.2% | 21.6% | 16.9% |
| Overall: aged 15+ | 42.2% | 43.0% | 62.8% | 71.8% |
| Source: Calculations by the Canadian Council on Social Development using Statistics Canada's General Social Survey, Cycle 14, 2000. | ||||
The younger you are, the more likely you are to have access to and use a computer – even if it isn’t in your home. The older you are, the less likely you are to use a computer, even if there is one in your home. This applies to both persons with and those without disabilities.
Among the youngest group (those aged 15 to 34), the rate of computer use is higher than the rate of having a home computer, both for those with and those without disabilities. For example, 67.9 per cent of young adults without disabilities have one or more computers in their home, but 86.8 per cent report having used a computer in the last year. This suggests that a fairly high proportion of these young people have acquired computer access outside their homes. Young people with disabilities also go outside their homes to gain access to computers: among this age group, 64.3 per cent have one or more computers in the home, yet 80.1 per cent report computer usage in the last year (see Table 2).
While young computer users gain access to computers outside their homes, some older individuals who have computers aren’t using them. This applies to both those with and those without disabilities. For example, among persons aged 65 and older with a disability, 18.0 per cent had at least one computer in their home, yet only 10.2 per cent had actually used a computer in the last 12 months. Similarly, 21.6 per cent of seniors without disabilities had at least one computer in their home, yet only 16.9 per cent had used one over the last 12 months.
Many young people use a computer at the home of a friend or relative.3 Among those aged 15 to 34, persons with and those without disabilities are almost equally likely to have used a friend’s computer in the previous month (36.4 per cent and 35.3 per cent, respectively; see Table 3). Similarly, they are almost equally likely to have used a computer at a relative’s home (22.9 per cent and 20.5 per cent, respectively).
| Used a Computer in the Past 12 Months at the Home of a Friend or Relative, Persons with and without Disabilities, by Age Group, Canada, 2000 | ||||
| Persons with disabilities | Persons without disabilities | |||
| Age Group | Friend's Computer | Relative's Computer | Friend's Computer | Relative's Computer |
| 15-34 years | 36.4% | 22.9% | 35.3% | 20.5% |
| 35-54 years | 16.6% | 13.7% | 12.0% | 8.9% |
| 55-64 years | 8.9% | 12.6% | 6.1% | 8.7% |
| 65+ years | 7.4% | 15.0% | 5.2% | 11.9% |
| Source: Calculations by the Canadian Council on Social Development using Statistics Canada's General Social Survey, Cycle 14, 2000 | ||||
Among persons aged 35 to 54, however, those with disabilities are slightly more likely to have used a friend’s computer than are their non-disabled counterparts (16.6 per cent, compared with 12 per cent). They are also slightly more likely than their non-disabled counterparts to have used a computer at a relative’s home (13.7 per cent, compared with 8.9 per cent).
Similarly for people aged 55 to 64. Among those with disabilities, 8.9 per cent went to a friend’s home and 12.6 per cent went to a relative’s home to use a computer; among those without disabilities, the figures are 6.1 per cent and 8.7 per cent. Even among seniors, those with disabilities are slightly more likely than those without disabilities to have used a computer at the home of a relative (15 per cent and 11.9 per cent, respectively).
School is another important venue for computer use. Among students, the majority of those with and those without disabilities accessed a computer at school. For students with disabilities, 78.3 per cent reported using a computer at school, compared with 77.6 per cent of those without disabilities.
Among students without disabilities, those who had a computer at home were very slightly more likely than those who did not have a home computer to use one at school (78.0 per cent, compared with 75.2 per cent ). Similarly among disabled students, those with a home computer were more likely than those without a home computer to utilize one at school (79.9 per cent and 71.1 per cent, respectively).
Among those working in the paid labour force, younger persons (aged 15 to 34) with or without disabilities were almost equally likely to use a computer on the job. With older age groups, however, there were gaps. Among persons aged 35 to 54, 69.8 per cent of those with disabilities and 78.2 per cent of those without disabilities used a computer on the job. Similarly, among persons aged 55 to 64, 68.6 per cent of those with disabilities and 78.7 per cent of those without disabilities used computers on the job (see Chart 3). These findings suggest that among workers over age 35, there are notable differences in the types of work performed.
People with a home computer were slightly more likely to have a job that required computer use, and this was true both for persons with and for those without disabilities. However, the differences were very slight. Among employed persons with disabilities who had a computer in their home, 65.5 per cent used one on the job as well, compared with 62.8 per cent of those who did not have a home computer. For employed persons without disabilities, these figures were 69.2 per cent and 66.7 per cent, respectively (see Chart 4). These data suggest that for employed persons, regardless of disability, the presence of a computer in the home does not really have a great impact on whether or not a computer is used on the job.
And while there may be little evidence to suggest that the absence of a home computer strongly directs people away from jobs requiring computer use, regardless of the presence of a disability, there is evidence to suggest that for persons with disabilities, having a home computer is related to whether or not they have a job. For persons without disabilities, those with and those without a home computer are equally likely to be working at a paid job (68.7 per cent and 69.3 per cent, respectively). However, among persons with disabilities, those who have a home computer are much more likely to be working at a paid job (55.0 per cent) than are those without a computer in their home (41.7 per cent).
Unfortunately, with these data, we are unable to determine the temporal sequence in this relationship. Does the absence of a home computer place persons with disabilities at a disadvantage in the labour market, leaving them less likely to obtain paid employment? Or, does having paid employment simply facilitate the purchase of a home computer or make the person more likely to require a home computer? More research needs to be done to sort out the causality in this relationship.
1The "new" Statistics Canada screening question for disability is used in the GSS 14. Disability is detected through two questions, as follows:
1. Do you have any difficulty hearing, seeing, communicating, walking, climbing stairs, bending, learning, or doing any similar activities?
Sometimes
Often
Never
Not stated
2. Does a long term physical or mental condition or health problem reduce the amount or the kind of activity that you can do at home, at school, at work or in other activities? Is it . . .
Sometimes
Often
Never
Not stated
Note: Anyone answering “Sometimes” or “Often” on either question is counted as having a disability. This results in a higher disability rate than was previously detected using the more basic screening questions of the past (which were similar to the second question on its own). It is important to note, however, that we also conducted an analysis using only the second screening question so that the data would be comparable to the question used on previous surveys. The story that resulted from that analysis was almost identical to the current analysis presented here. While the precise numbers may differ somewhat, the relationships and conclusions remained the same.
2See, for example: In Unison 2000: Persons with Disabilities in Canada by the Federal, Provincial and Territorial Ministers Responsible for Social Services, 2000, page 68.
3Some people use a computer at the home of a friend or relative, despite having at least one computer in their own home. However, those without a computer at home are more likely to use one at the home of a friend or relative.
Among persons with disabilities, 20.2 per cent of those who had a home computer also used a friend’s computer, but for those who had no computer at home, 26.6 per cent accessed one at a friend’s place; 14.5 per cent of persons with disabilities who had a home computer also used one at a relative’s place, but for those without a home computer, 24.8 per cent reported accessing one at a relative’s.
For persons without disabilities, 20.7 per cent of those who had a home computer also used a friend’s computer, but among those without a home computer, 29.3 per cent reported using a friend’s computer; 12.3 per cent of